Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Assessing range shifts of tropical reef fishes: a comparison of belt transect and roaming underwater visual census methods

Authors: Hayden J Beck; David A Feary; William F Figueira; David J Booth;

Assessing range shifts of tropical reef fishes: a comparison of belt transect and roaming underwater visual census methods

Abstract

Accurate, precise, and efficient underwater visual censuses (UVc) are vital for detecting and monitoring range shifts of reef fishes. The present study compared the utility of time-equivalent belt transects and Global Positioning system (GPs)-tracked roaming surveys for assessing populations of range-expanding tropical fishes off southeastern Australia. roaming surveys were significantly more accurate and precise than belt transects in estimating densities of focal damselfish, Abudefduf vaigiensis (Quoy and Gaimard, 1825), while the accuracy and precision of density estimates did not significantly differ between methods for the rarer focal species, Abudefduf whitleyi (Allen and robertson, 1974). significantly greater species richness and assemblage diversity were detected by roaming surveys than belt transects. roaming surveys were also over twice as efficient, defined as the area searched per unit time, as belt transects; mean efficiency of roaming surveys and belt transects was 33.56 (sE 1.22) and 12.57 (sE 0.66) m2 min-1, respectively. results were consistent among observers with varied experience. reliable density estimates, improved efficiency, and maximized sightings of tropical fishes suggest GPs-tracked roaming surveys are highly suited for detecting and monitoring range shifts of reef fishes.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!