Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Postharvest Storage Losses Associated with Aphanomyces Root Rot in Sugarbeet

Authors: Larry G. Campbell; Karen L. Klotz;

Postharvest Storage Losses Associated with Aphanomyces Root Rot in Sugarbeet

Abstract

Because of its persistence in the soil and the ineffectiveness of control measures, Aphanomyces cochlioides (causal organism of Aphanomyces root rot) is one of the more problematic pathogens attacking sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris). As a consequence, diseased roots often are included in storage piles; however, information on the consequences of storing roots with Aphanomyces root rot is lacking. Roots from six commercial fields with chronic root rot problems were divided into groups based upon root rot severity. Prior to measuring storage respiration rate, sucrose concentration, and extractable sucrose concentration, a root rot index (0 = no rot to 100 = completely rotted) was determined for each sample. Regression analyses were used to characterize relationships among root rot index, postharvest respiration rate, and extractable sucrose losses during storage for 120 days. Below rot indices of 35, Aphanomyces had little or no effect on respiration rate or extractable sucrose loss during storage. Sucrose losses associated with rot indices of 65 and 80 were 1.8 and 2.8 times those associated with a rot index of 35, respectively. Aphanomyces root rot has the potential to significantly increase losses during storage; however, field by Aphanomyces severity interactions and variability in the observed response patterns indicate that accurately predicting these losses prior to harvest will be difficult. This report provides information that will assist in determining the Aphanomyces root rot severity that would justify not harvesting a field or if roots from diseased fields should be processed early in the campaign.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!