
This article presents a compatibility analysis of search engines with the acquiring knowledge process. The motivation was determine the possibility of inconsistencies between results' selection criteria adopted by these tools and cognitive learning aspects. It was sought to identify the physiological and psychological processes that occur when we are acquiring knowledge and then it was evaluated possible inconsistencies with the search engines operations. As a result of research, it was noticed that popularity use in hierarchization of results diverges from cognitive characteristics of users and may impose difficulties for new knowledge acquisition.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
