
Many current deterministic solvers for NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems are based on nonlinear relaxation techniques that use floating point arithmetic. Occasionally, due to solving these relaxations, rounding errors may produce erroneous results, although the deterministic algorithm should compute the exact solution in a finite number of steps. This may occur especially if the relaxations are ill-conditioned or ill-posed, and if Slater's constraint qualifications fail. We show how exact solutions can be obtained by rigorously bounding the optimal value of semidefinite relaxations, even in the ill-posed case. All rounding errors due to floating point arithmetic are taken into account.
Semidefinite Programming, Ill-posed Problems, Combinatorial Optimization, branch-and-bound, interval arithmetic, Verification Methods, illposed problems, 510, 004
Semidefinite Programming, Ill-posed Problems, Combinatorial Optimization, branch-and-bound, interval arithmetic, Verification Methods, illposed problems, 510, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
