
We characterize the model spaces K_\Theta in which functions with smooth boundary extensions are dense. It is shown that such approximations are possible if and only if the singular measure associated to the singular inner factor of \Theta is concentrated on a countable union of Beurling–Carleson sets. In fact, we use a duality argument to show that if there exists a restriction of the associated singular measure which does not assign positive measure to any Beurling–Carleson set, then even larger classes of functions, such as Hölder classes and large collections of analytic Sobolev spaces, fail to be dense. In contrast to earlier results on density of functions with continuous extensions to the boundary in K_\Theta and related spaces, the existence of a smooth approximant is obtained through a constructive method.
Mathematics - Functional Analysis, Hardy spaces, model space, reproducing kernel, 30J05 (Primary), 30J15, 46E22, 47B32 (Secondary), FOS: Mathematics, Inner functions of one complex variable, Hardy space, Hilbert spaces with reproducing kernels (= (proper) functional Hilbert spaces, including de Branges-Rovnyak and other structured spaces), Functional Analysis (math.FA)
Mathematics - Functional Analysis, Hardy spaces, model space, reproducing kernel, 30J05 (Primary), 30J15, 46E22, 47B32 (Secondary), FOS: Mathematics, Inner functions of one complex variable, Hardy space, Hilbert spaces with reproducing kernels (= (proper) functional Hilbert spaces, including de Branges-Rovnyak and other structured spaces), Functional Analysis (math.FA)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
