
arXiv: 1901.04328
Quantum groups have been studied within several areas of mathematics and mathematical physics. This has led to different approaches, each of them with their own techniques and conventions. Starting with Hopf algebras, where there is a general consensus, moving in the direction of topological quantum groups, where there is no such consensus, it is easy to get lost. Not only many difficulties have to be overcome, but also several choices must be made. The way this is done is often confusing. Some choices even turn out to be rather annoying. As an introductory lecture at the conference on Topological quantum groups and Hopf algebras in 2016, we have explained these choices, difficulties and annoyances, encountered on the road from Hopf algebras to topological quantum groups. In these notes, we discuss more aspects of the development of locally compact quantum groups. We not only explain some of these difficulties in greater detail, but we also give background information about the different steps, combined with some historical comments. We start with finite quantum groups and continue with discrete quantum groups, compact quantum groups and algebraic quantum groups. Multiplicative unitaries are an important side track before we finally arrive at locally compact quantum groups. Along the way, we also formulate some interesting remaining problems in the theory.
Primary 16-01, 16T05, 17B37, 46-01, Secondary 22D25, Rings and Algebras (math.RA), Mathematics - Quantum Algebra, FOS: Mathematics, Quantum Algebra (math.QA), Mathematics - Rings and Algebras
Primary 16-01, 16T05, 17B37, 46-01, Secondary 22D25, Rings and Algebras (math.RA), Mathematics - Quantum Algebra, FOS: Mathematics, Quantum Algebra (math.QA), Mathematics - Rings and Algebras
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
