
Straipsnyje analizuojama žymaus lietuvių socialinio teoretiko Vytauto Kavolio civilizacijų tyrimų metodologija. Siekiama atsakyti į klausimą, ar V. Kavolis užima metodologinio anarchizmo poziciją, pagal kurią „viskas tinka“, ar vis dėlto jo civilizacijų tyrimų metodologija, nepaisant savo tarpdisciplininio ir multimetodologinio pobūdžio, turi ją koordinuojantį branduolį? Straipsnio autorius gina teiginį, kad Vytautas Kavolis nėra metodologinio anarchizmo atstovas. Jis nuosekliai plėtoja civilizacijų tyrimų metodologiją, kurios branduolį sudaro civilizacijų analizės metodas. Esant tarpdisciplininiam požiūriui, konkrečias disciplinas ir teorinius požiūrius papildomai koordinuoja tyrimų objektas (civilizacija). The paper deals with the civilization study methodology of V. Kavolis, a prominent Lithuanian social theoretician. A question is raised whether he is a representative of methodological anarchism. The author of the paper argues that V. Kavolis is not a proponent of methodological anarchism. V. Kavolis, civilization study methodology, despite its interdisciplinary and multimethodological nature, is quite consistent. First of all, its consistency relies on the Method of Civilization Analysis. Besides, it is coordinated by the study object – civilization. V. Kavolis uses so many disciplines, methods and theoretical approaches when analyzing any civilization element, level or process. From the standpoint of V. Kavolis, various disciplines, methods and theoretical approaches do not confront but supplement one another.
Lietuva (Lithuania), Metodologija, Methodology, Civilizacija, Civilization
Lietuva (Lithuania), Metodologija, Methodology, Civilizacija, Civilization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
