
doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.4.579
pmid: 21659152
Some species described as gynodioecious are truly gynomonoecious‐gynodioecious. Three distinct phenotypes may be found in their natural populations—female and hermaphrodite pure‐sexed plants bearing either only pistillate or perfect flowers, respectively, and mixed plants bearing both types of flowers. In one such species, Dianthus sylvestris, we investigated mating system parameters using allozyme data. Outcrossing rates and correlations of outcrossed paternity were calculated for the three types of plants and separately for pistillate and perfect flowers on mixed plants. The mean outcrossing rate for the population was tm ± SD = 0.885 ± 0.032. Females were more outcrossed than hermaphrodites (0.987 ± 0.112 and 0.790 ± 0.076, respectively), whereas mixed plants were not significantly more or less outcrossed than hermaphrodites (0.840 ± 0.060). Within mixed plants, perfect flowers showed an intermediate outcrossing rate (0.898 ± 0.057), whereas pistillate flowers were as selfed as perfect flowers on hermaphrodite plants (0.782 ± 0.111). Family estimates of outcrossing rates were highly variable. Globally, no biparental inbreeding was detected in this species, and there was a mean of 61.5 ± 19.9% of full‐sibs within families. Floral dimorphism between small pistillate and large perfect flowers together with pollinator preference for larger flowers could explain the observed patterns for both mating parameters. The advantages of gynomonoecy‐gynodioecy are discussed. We conclude that mixed plants do not reduce selfing for all flowers on a plant, but perfect flowers on these plants seem to have an outcrossing advantage.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
