
Greenhouse gas removal (GGR) raises many cultural, ethical, legal, social, and political issues, yet in the growing area of GGR research, humanities and social sciences (HASS) research is often marginalized, constrained and depoliticised. This global dynamic is illustrated by an analysis of the UK GGR research programme. This dynamic matters for the knowledge produced and for its users. Without HASS contributions, too narrow a range of perspectives, futures and issues will be considered, undermining or overpromising the prospects for the responsible development of GGR (and threatening worse side-effects), and limiting our understanding of why and how policy demands GGR solutions in the first place. In response, we present policy principles for bringing HASS fully into GGR research, organized around three themes: (1) HASS-led GGR research, (2) Opening up GGR futures, and (3) The politics of GGR futures.
330, 37 Earth Sciences, 41 Environmental Sciences, 3702 Climate Change Science, 300, Environmental sciences, UK GGRprogramme, 8.3 Policy, ethics, and research governance, research policy principles, 4101 Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation, depoliticised, GE1-350, GGR research, constrained, humanities and social sciences, marginalized, UK GGR programme
330, 37 Earth Sciences, 41 Environmental Sciences, 3702 Climate Change Science, 300, Environmental sciences, UK GGRprogramme, 8.3 Policy, ethics, and research governance, research policy principles, 4101 Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation, depoliticised, GE1-350, GGR research, constrained, humanities and social sciences, marginalized, UK GGR programme
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
