<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Nanomaterials possess unique features which make them particularly attractive for biosensing applications. In particular, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) can serve as scaffolds for immobilization of biomolecules at their surface, and combine several exceptional physical, chemical, electrical, and optical characteristics properties which make them one of the best suited materials for the transduction of signals associated with the recognition of analytes, metabolites, or disease biomarkers. Here we provide a comprehensive review on these carbon nanostructures, in which we describe their structural and physical properties, functionalization and cellular uptake, biocompatibility, and toxicity issues. We further review historical developments in the field of biosensors, and describe the different types of biosensors which have been developed over time, with specific focus on CNT-conjugates engineered for biosensing applications, and in particular detection of cancer biomarkers.
Biosensing, [CHIM.THER] Chemical Sciences/Medicinal Chemistry, Carbon nanotube, Fluorescence, internalization, Chemistry, biocompatibility, [SDV.CAN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, [SDV.BBM] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, functionalization, cancer, Biocompatibility, fluorescence, biosensing, carbon nanotube, Functionalization, QD1-999, Cancer, Internalization
Biosensing, [CHIM.THER] Chemical Sciences/Medicinal Chemistry, Carbon nanotube, Fluorescence, internalization, Chemistry, biocompatibility, [SDV.CAN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, [SDV.BBM] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, functionalization, cancer, Biocompatibility, fluorescence, biosensing, carbon nanotube, Functionalization, QD1-999, Cancer, Internalization
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 280 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |