Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Plant Reg...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Plant Registrations
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Plant Registrations
Article
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: UnpayWall
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Registration of ‘Impact’ Crabgrass

Authors: Joseph H. Bouton; Brian Motes; Michael A. Trammell; Twain J. Butler;

Registration of ‘Impact’ Crabgrass

Abstract

Impact (Reg. No. CV‐283, PI 687328) crabgrass [Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koeler] was developed by the Noble Research Institute, LLC, and released in 2016. Selections were made from ‘Red River’ by recurrent phenotypic selection for late flowering and high individual plant yield. In Ardmore, OK, trials in 2014 and 2015, Impact headed significantly later than Red River and the early‐maturing cultivar Quick‐n‐Big. This later maturity produced in vitro true dry matter digestibility numerically greater than Red River and significantly greater than Quick‐n‐Big (697 g kg−1 vs. 685 and 665 g kg−1, respectively, across 11 harvests) and lower neutral detergent fiber (635 g kg−1 vs. 654 g kg−1) than Quick‐n‐Big. In Oklahoma, there were no consistent differences in monthly or total dry matter yields in Impact compared with Red River (Impact ranged from 9160 to 19,764 kg ha−1, depending on year and location), but Impact yielded higher during most late‐season harvest dates (mid‐August–early October) compared with Quick‐n‐Big. At Vashti, TX, during 2014, Impact produced more monthly forage and total dry matter yield than both Red River and Quick‐n‐Big. In Mississippi and Tennessee, cultivar differences were similar to Oklahoma results. Impact demonstrated summer animal gains of 0.78 kg d−1 and total season gains of 230 kg ha−1. It is high yielding and should be broadly adapted as annual summer pasture throughout the south‐central and southeastern United States.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Average
hybrid