Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://www.gci.or.i...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://www.gci.or.id/assets/p...
Article
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: UnpayWall
https://doi.org/10.29210/20181...
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Intensive reading skills with cooperative integrated reading composition (CIRC) and group investigation (GI)

Authors: Ika Panggih Wahyuningtyas; Ermanto Ermanto; Abdurahman Abdurahman;

Intensive reading skills with cooperative integrated reading composition (CIRC) and group investigation (GI)

Abstract

This research aims to know the difference in the results of learning to read with intensive using the model of the CIRC and learning motivation of GI in grade VII MTs Country Muara Bulian. This type of research was quasi experiment (experiment of the artificial) and design used in this study is a 2 x 2 factorial. This research population is students of Class VII MTs Country Muara Bulian. First, The average reading skills of students who are taught in an intensive learning CIRC. was 81.00, while students taught with model GI was 79.40. Both , the average the learning model CIRC. is 83.25, students learning motivation high taught with model GI was 84.40. Third, the average reading skills of students ' learning motivation low intensive taught by learning model CIRC. was 78.75 and taught with model GI is 74.40.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid