
doi: 10.28945/4686
Aim/Purpose: Due to the rapid development of digital technology, create knowledge to support the development of education for lifelong learning. Background: There is a lack of normative and prescriptive support that can guide the development of education concerning lifelong learning. Methodology: Design science research, interviews, grounded theory and root-cause analysis. Contribution: Contribution to practice: A master program in Information Systems that supports lifelong learning. Contribution to theory: Advancements on design knowledge that can guide the development of education programs concerning rapid advancements in digital technology. Findings: Five design principles: consider rapid development of digital technology, balance time-consuming bureaucratic procedures with companies’ demands for speedy access to modern courses, simplify procedures for students applying with work experience qualifications, implement plans for competence development of teachers, and base courses on rigour and relevance. Recommendations for Practitioners: Companies could enter the whole education program or select interesting courses or course modules. Recommendation for Researchers: The design principles should be considered when research on guidance concerning lifelong learning for adult learners is conducted. Impact on Society: Lifelong learning enhances social inclusion, active citizenship and personal development, as well as competitiveness and employability. Future Research: Further validation of the design principles in order to create knowledge that can support the development of education for lifelong learning.
design principles, Computer and Information Sciences, development of study programs, academy-industry collaboration, lifelong learning, Data- och informationsvetenskap
design principles, Computer and Information Sciences, development of study programs, academy-industry collaboration, lifelong learning, Data- och informationsvetenskap
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
