
doi: 10.2514/3.59032
Various rating scales have been derived to assist in the quantification flight test data. Several of these scales currently in use are examined and compared with emphasis on transference from scale to scale. The problem of nonlinearity of scales that depend upon adjective descriptions is considered, and a hypothesis is advanced that a rater may transpose his impressions of performance directly to any scale without recourse to adjective descriptions and thereby relate his mentally derived, divisionless scale directly to a numerical index. Experimental data, though limited, tend to support this hypothesis.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
