
doi: 10.2514/2.442 , 10.2514/3.13879
Essential steps toward establishing credibility in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are outlined, and a vision for the process of systematic collaborative validation that is open to public scrutiny via the Internet is suggested. It begins with an exposition of the elements of CFD simulations and reviews protocols useful for establishing credibility. The various sources of uncertainty in CFD, which include the skills of the user, are presented. Lessons learned from collective verification and validation exercises done in the past are surveyed and lead to our suggestion for a systematic validation process that requires the creation and use of a detailed flow taxonomy for the given application field. The code validator uses the taxonomy and an electronic database to carry out the validation process. This database archives but also gives easy access to trustworthy data and allows full public discussion and scrutiny of the information, comparisons, and hypotheses so that judgments and conclusions about the validation may be accepted or rejected by the scientific community at large. The taxonomy also is the basis on which the code user transfers credibility from previously validated generic flow cases to the simulation at hand.
Aerospace Engineering
Aerospace Engineering
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 50 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
