
A 1D bubble expansion problem is solved using standard compressible methods whose numerical solutions are compared with the exact low-Mach solution of the problem. The low Mach solution is proved to provide a very good approximation of the grid-converged compressible solution for a weak expansion and an envelope solution for the strong expansion. This motivates the design of a newly proposed Artificial Compressibility solver which will speed up low-Mach simulations of interest for nuclear safety with respect to standard compressible solvers.
artificial compressibility method, exergy criterion, [SPI.MECA.MEFL] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Fluids mechanics [physics.class-ph], bubble expansion, low-Mach number flows
artificial compressibility method, exergy criterion, [SPI.MECA.MEFL] Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Fluids mechanics [physics.class-ph], bubble expansion, low-Mach number flows
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
