Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Range Man...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Range Management
Article . 1990 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Defoliation Frequency and Intensity Effects on Pasture Forage Quality

Authors: Iraj Motazedian; Steven H. Sharrow;

Defoliation Frequency and Intensity Effects on Pasture Forage Quality

Abstract

Both quantity and quality of pasture forage produced generally varies with frequency and intensity of plant defoliation. However, intensity and frequency of defoliation have rarely been evaluated simultaneously. The objective of this study was to quantify forage quality response to simultaneous changes in defoliation treatments over a range of values likely to occur in short-duration grazing systems. Effects of defoliation treatments on forage digestibility (DMD), crude protein content (CPC), crude protein yield, and digestible dry matter yield were evaluated on a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne, L.)-subclover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) hill land pasture growing on a Ultic Haploxeroll soil near Corvallis, Oregon. Treatments consisted of all possible combinations of 4 defoliation intervals (clipped every 7, 21, 35, or 49 days) and 3 stubble heights (High-70, Medium-55, or Low-40 mm of stubble remaining after defoliation) applied during the 1980, 1981, and 1982 growing seasons. Digestible dry matter yield increased with increasing defoliation interval. With the exception of DMD in 1980, both digestibility and CPC of the forage produced decreased linearly as the period between defoliation events increased. Crude protein content increased linearly as stubble height increased, while forage digestibility was comparatively insensitive to changes in stubble height. Forage quality was generally adequate on all treatments to meet the needs of most classes of livestock.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Average
bronze