
doi: 10.2307/2533103
pmid: 9147589
In this paper we study a regression calibration method for failure time regression analysis when data on some covariates are missing or mismeasured. The method estimates the missing data based on the data structure estimated from a validation data set, a random subsample of the study cohort in which covariates are always observed. Ordinary Cox (1972; Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34, 187-220) regression is then applied to estimate the regression coefficients, using the observed covariates in the validation data set and the estimated covariates in the nonvalidation data set. The method can be easily implemented. We present the asymptotic theory of the proposed estimator. Finite sample performance is examined and compared with an estimated partial likelihood estimator and other related methods via simulation studies, where the proposed method performs well even though it is technically inconsistent. Finally, we illustrate the method with a mouse leukemia data set.
surrogate covariate, Likelihood Functions, Biometry, Leukemia, Experimental, Time Factors, Asymptotic distribution theory in statistics, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, measurement error model, Mice, Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH), Inference from stochastic processes, estimating equation, Animals, Regression Analysis
surrogate covariate, Likelihood Functions, Biometry, Leukemia, Experimental, Time Factors, Asymptotic distribution theory in statistics, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, measurement error model, Mice, Time series, auto-correlation, regression, etc. in statistics (GARCH), Inference from stochastic processes, estimating equation, Animals, Regression Analysis
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 140 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
