
doi: 10.2307/2532857
pmid: 8962462
We propose two test statistics based on the covariance process of the martingale residuals for testing independence of bivariate survival data. The first test statistic takes the supremum over time of the absolute value of the covariance process, and the second test statistic is a time-weighted summary of the process. We derive asymptotic properties of the two test statistics under the null hypothesis of independence. In addition, we derive the asymptotic distribution of the weighted test and construct optimal weights for contiguous alternatives to independence. Through simulations, we compare the performance of the proposed tests and the inner product of the Savage scores statistics of Clayton and Cuzick (1985, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 148, 82-108). These demonstrate that the supremum test is generally more powerful with comparatively little power loss relative to their test when Clayton's family alternative holds, and the weighted test is more powerful when the weight is appropriately chosen.
Analysis of Variance, Biometry, Models, Statistical, Time Factors, testing independence, Graft Survival, contiguous alternatives, cross ratio, Skin Transplantation, Survival Analysis, covariance process, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, bivariate failure times, bivariate survival data, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Heart Transplantation, Humans, Computer Simulation, Monte Carlo Method, martingale residuals
Analysis of Variance, Biometry, Models, Statistical, Time Factors, testing independence, Graft Survival, contiguous alternatives, cross ratio, Skin Transplantation, Survival Analysis, covariance process, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, bivariate failure times, bivariate survival data, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Heart Transplantation, Humans, Computer Simulation, Monte Carlo Method, martingale residuals
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
