
doi: 10.2307/2530492
pmid: 7370373
A second-order correction is derived for the usual first-order order approximation to the probability of ascertaining a pedigree. Both the first- and second-order approximations are compared to the exact ascertainment probability for selected examples of monogenic and polygenic traits. The second-order approximation is shown to be accurate within 10% when the individual ascertainment probability is less than 0.2, for most cases examined. In all cases, the first- and second-order approximations provide upper and lower bounds, respectively, for the exact ascertainment probability.
monogenic traits, Models, Genetic, second-order approximations of ascertainment probabilities, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, polygenic traits, Pedigree, pedigree analysis, Humans, Genetics and epigenetics, Probability
monogenic traits, Models, Genetic, second-order approximations of ascertainment probabilities, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, polygenic traits, Pedigree, pedigree analysis, Humans, Genetics and epigenetics, Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
