
doi: 10.2307/2529311
pmid: 843572
A new tolerance distribution and inference procedure for quantal response assays is presented. This method is capable of fitting a wide variety of shapes of response curves. Specific cases of this new method include quantal response assay analyses based on the double exponential distribution, the logistic distribution (logit analysis), and the uniform distribution (linit analysis) in a limiting case. Computational techniques used to implement the likelihood procedures associated with this method are described. Comparisons are made for 22 sets of published data. These comparisons suggest that interval estimates of extreme dosages (e.g., ED95 and ED99) based on logit and probit analyses are, for the most part, either overly optimistic (too small) or overly pessimistic (too large). This interval estimation problem should be partially overcome by the added flexibility of the method introduced here.
Statistics as Topic, Point estimation, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
Statistics as Topic, Point estimation, Technology, Pharmaceutical, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
