Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ecologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ecology
Article . 1990 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Comparative Demography of Three Graminoids Infected by Systemic, Clavicipitaceous Fungi

Authors: Keith Clay;

Comparative Demography of Three Graminoids Infected by Systemic, Clavicipitaceous Fungi

Abstract

Few experimental studies have addressed the demographic consequences of plant—microbe symbiosis in natural communities. In this study the survival, growth, and reproduction of tall fescue grass (Festuca arundinacea), smut grass (Sporobolus poiretii), and green sedge (Cyperus virens) infected by the imperfect fungus Acremonium coenophialum, the ascomycetous fungus Balansia epichloe, and B. cyperi, respectively, were compared with uninfected conspecifics in field experiments conducted in natural plant communities in southern Louisiana. Equal numbers of infected and uninfected ramets of each species were propagated in the greenhouse from infected and uninfected seed lots (F. arundinacea) or from field—collected infected and uninfected plants (S. poiretii and C. virens). Ramets of the two grasses were planted into a grassland community where the two species were dominant members of the community. Ramets of the sedge were planted into a marshy area where C. virens occurred naturally. Numbers of tillers were counted for each ramet upon planting for subsequent use as a covariate, and each ramet was censused from one to three times a year for three consecutive years. All survivors were then harvested and aboveground dry biomass was determined. For F. arundinacea, infected ramets exhibited higher survival, flowering frequency, vegetative tiller production, and biomass over the 3—yr period. Relative fitness, calculated from survival and inflorescence production, was nearly twice as high for infected ramets, indicating a mutualistic relationship between F. arundinacea and its endophytic fungus. For S. poiretii, growth and survival of infected and uninfected ramets were similar, but flowering was greatly suppressed in infected ramets. Relative fitness of infected ramets was only °1/10 that of uninfected ramets, indicating a pathogenic relationship. There was evidence of substantial contagious spread of the fungus in the experimental population. Infected ramets of C. virens had significantly higher survival over 3 yr and tended to be bigger than uninfected ramets. Inflorescences were produced by both types of ramets, but the inflorescences of infected ramets were always aborted. The results indicate that, within a closely related group of fungi, both pathogenic and mutualistic relationships with host plants exist. Maternally inherited, seed—borne endophytes similar to the one in F. arundinacea are found in any grasses, suggesting that analogous mutualisms are common. The greater survival and vegetative vigor of infected C. virens call into question the traditional notion of fitness as applied to plants capable of extensive asexual reproduction. The biological mechanisms responsible for the greater survival and growth of infected plants probably include induced alterations in the host plant's hormonal balance, greater tolerance to abiotic stresses, and increased resistance to herbivores and pathogens.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    52
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
52
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!