
The Colwell—Futuyma niche metrics are examined by means of data on microgeographic distribution of 25 species of drosophilid flies. Niche metrics based on a variety of weighting factors (circular, non—circular, absolute, and relative) are highly positively correlated. Unweighted metrics are highly correlated with all weighted metrics. The niche breadth and overlap values with drosophilids as weighting factors are highly positively correlated to metrics using drosophilids matched with co—occurring plants, even though the weights are slightly negatively correlated. Increasing the number of species in the resource matrix (species X resource states table) decreases the variation in weights of resource states and they approach uniform distinctness. Most drosophilid species are broad niched for all calculation methods used. Samplig error may account for some skewing of breadth values because flies might be attracted into otherwise unfavorable environments by the baits.
Insecta, Arthropoda, fruit flies, Diptera, flies, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taxonomy
Insecta, Arthropoda, fruit flies, Diptera, flies, Animalia, Biodiversity, Taxonomy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
