Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ecologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ecology
Article . 1972 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Bird Species Diversity: The Effect of Species Richness and Equitability on the Diversity Index

Authors: John C. Kricher;

Bird Species Diversity: The Effect of Species Richness and Equitability on the Diversity Index

Abstract

A study of bird species diversity (BSD) on three seral stages characteristic of secondary succession on the New Jersey Piedmont was done during the winter of 1968—69, the spring of 1969, and the summer of 1969. The seral studies were a 2— to 33—year—old field (the herbaceous field), a 30—year—old field (the cedar field), and a climax oak—hickory forest (the oak forest). Two study plots, each with an area of 2 hectares, were chosen within each seral stage. Diversity indices were calculated using the Shannon—Weaver information formula, H'=—‐Σpilogepi. The species count (species richness) was found to account for many of the differences in BSD between the seral stages. The evenness with which species were numerically distributed (equitability) was found to be lowest and to be lowest and to have its greatest influence on the diversity index in the herbaceous field, due to the presence of large flocks of non—nesting species. Equitability was higher and more constant in the cedar field and oak forest. Territoriality was thought to account for the higher equitabilities observed in summer. In winter, the more rigorous environment was thought to be a factor in lowering the equitability at least in the cedar field.Equitability was not lowered as much in the oak forest, possibly due to aggregations of birds into mixed species flocks. The cedar field and oak forest were qui te different in the seasonal patterns of equitability. Both species richness and equitability were concluded to be important parameters in ecological study.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    34
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
34
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!