
doi: 10.2307/1919359
pmid: 11618298
I N an innovative article of I978 Herbert S. Klein and Stanley L. Engerman, addressing the problem of fertility differentials between slave populations of the United States and the British Caribbean, emphasized that the significant difference between the two areas in rates of natural increase is largely explainable by the higher fertility of American slaves. They contended that differences in the child-spacing period could partially account for differences in fertility rates: in the West Indies, birth interval ranged between three and four years, while in the United States it was close to three years. While acknowledging that spacing could result from several factors, Klein and Engerman focused on the lactation period and found that the breast-feeding interval for North American slave women "was generally about one year, while for the West Indies it was typically at least two years."1 Students of Caribbean slave life have long accustomed themselves to working with limited information. Although sources for investigating the institution of slavery and its political and economic dimensions are abundant, the more mundane aspects of slave sociocultural and domestic life were much less apt to be recorded by contemporary white observers. Whatever the implications for understanding slave fertility patterns, the topics of lactation and weaning very well illustrate the limited data base that scholars often have been obliged to employ in treating the domestic behavioral patterns of Caribbean slaves.
History, Early Modern 1451-1600, History, Modern 1601-, Child Welfare, History, Medieval, Diet, Black or African American, Caribbean Region, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, History, Ancient
History, Early Modern 1451-1600, History, Modern 1601-, Child Welfare, History, Medieval, Diet, Black or African American, Caribbean Region, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, History, Ancient
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
