
handle: 1959.13/1036291
AbstractSmooth tests of goodness of fit assess the fit of data to a given probability density function within a class of alternatives that differs ‘smoothly’ from the null model. These alternatives are characterized by their order: the greater the order the richer the class of alternatives. The order may be a specified constant, but data‐driven methods use the data to select the order and give tests that are unlikely to miss important effects. When testing for distributions within exponential families the test statistic often has a very convenient form, being the sum of squares of components that are asymptotically independent and asymptotically standard normal. The number of components is strongly related to the order of the alternatives. If the data differ from the null model the components provide diagnostics, giving an indication of how they differ. Outside of exponential families generalized smooth tests incorporating a Cholesky decomposition are needed to obtain test statistics with the convenient form mentioned. Using the components to give moment diagnostics of the alternative is more problematic than thought initially. These may be augmented or replaced by model selection methods that give a smooth model and a graphical depiction of the real model. WIREs Comp Stat 2011 3 397–406 DOI: 10.1002/wics.171This article is categorized under: Statistical and Graphical Methods of Data Analysis > Nonparametric Methods
model selection, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Cholesky decomposition, generalized score tests, 310, data driven tests, orthonormal polynomials
model selection, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Cholesky decomposition, generalized score tests, 310, data driven tests, orthonormal polynomials
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
