Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Meat and Muscle Biol...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Meat and Muscle Biology
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Meat and Muscle Biology
Article
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Meat and Muscle Biology
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Meat and Muscle Biology
Article
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Instrumental Texture Analysis of Poultry Deli Loaves Prepared with Broiler Breast Fillets Exhibiting Woody Breast Characteristics

Authors: J. P. Caldas-Cueva; C. M. Owens;

Instrumental Texture Analysis of Poultry Deli Loaves Prepared with Broiler Breast Fillets Exhibiting Woody Breast Characteristics

Abstract

ObjectivesPotential applications of chicken meat with woody breast (WB) condition in further processing products could provide processors alternatives to face this meat quality problem. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the use of broiler breast fillets at varying degrees of WB severity on instrumental texture characteristics of deli loaves.Materials and MethodsA total of 270 breast fillets were collected from birds processed according to commercial practices and classified based on a scoring system for degree of hardness using tactile evaluation in three WB categories (0 or 0.5 as normal-NOR; 1 or 1.5 as mild-MIL, and 2, 2.5 or 3 as severe-SEV). Instrumental compression analysis was performed to validate subjective scores. Nine treatments with three replicates of deli loaves were prepared: 100% NOR (T1), 66.67% NOR + 33.33% MIL (T2), 66.67% NOR + 33.33% SEV (T3), 33.33% NOR + 66.67% MIL (T4), 33.33% NOR + 66.67% SEV (T5), 100% MIL (T6), 66.67% MIL + 33.33% SEV (T7), 33.33% MIL + 66.67% SEV (T8), and 100% SEV (T9). Chicken breast muscles (cranial region) separately by treatment were trimmed, cut, tumble marinated [20% (wt/wt) marinade pickup target; final product concentration of 1.25% sodium chloride and 0.45% sodium tripolyphosphate], stored, stuffed (diameter: 100 mm, length: 290 mm; 2.3 kg), and cooked (core temperature reached 75°C). Texture profile analysis (TPA: hardness, cohesiveness, springiness, and chewiness) was performed using a texture analyzer (TA.XT Plus, Texture Technologies Corp.). Additionally, cook loss, color (L*, a* and b*), and reduction in diameter and length were evaluated in cooked deli loaves. Data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with treatment factor fit as fixed effect.ResultsWith exception to T1 through T4 treatments, the hardness of chicken loaves increased (P < 0.05), whereas the cohesiveness decreased (P < 0.05) as WB severity increased in the meat added to the product formulation. Furthermore, the cook loss significantly increased (P < 0.05) as WB increased in the meat incorporated into the product. The use of affected meat with WB condition at SEV levels (T9) or meat combinations at MIL and SEV levels (T7 and T8) yielded non-uniform deli loaves with higher levels of cook loss (> 13%, P < 0.05), different color parameters and higher levels of reduction in diameter (> 8%, P < 0.05) and length (> 5%, P < 0.05) in comparison with NOR samples. However, the mixture of non-affected meat with WB meat at MIL (up to 67%) and SEV (up to 33%) levels did not show a significant difference compared to NOR samples in terms of hardness, cook loss, color, and reduction in dimensions.ConclusionThese data indicate that there is an important effect of the use of broiler breast fillets with WB characteristics on the texture profile of deli loaves. There is evidence of the poor functionality associated with the inclusion of WB meat in deli loaves in terms of water holding capacity, color, and texture. Although additional research is needed, the combination of breast fillets of regular quality (NOR) with those presenting WB condition at MIL (up to 67%) or SEV (up to 33%) levels could be considered by processors as an alternative in commercial chicken deli loaf formulations due to the inclusion of WB meat at higher levels can result in reduced product quality.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
gold