Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Imagination Cognitio...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Experience in Imagery and Imagery Vividness

Authors: Alfredo Campos; Rocío Gómez-Juncal; María José Pérez-Fabello;

Experience in Imagery and Imagery Vividness

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of experience in mental imagery, imagery type (normal, bizarre, or mixed), and the repetition of mental imagery formation on imagery vividness. Two experiments were carried out: Experiment 1 consisted of a sample of 152 Spanish compulsory secondary education students who were shown a list of 16 simple sentences describing normal, bizarre, or mixed normal and bizarre situations prior to rating their imagery vividness. The procedure was repeated with the same imagery after a 24-hour interval. Subjects were also asked about their experience in using mental imagery. Subjects with mental imagery experience rated imagery vividness higher than inexperienced subjects. Image vividness scores were higher after repeating imagery formation than in the first imagery vividness ratings. Mixed and bizarre imagery obtained higher imagery vividness scores than normal imagery. In Experiment 2 a sample of 146 students, of the same academic background as in Experiment 1, were shown a list of 16 complex sentences under the same experimental conditions. Significant differences in imagery vividness ratings were observed in terms of experience and repetition of imagery. Ratings were higher for experienced than inexperienced subjects, and in the second ratings following the repetition of imagery formation. No significant differences in imagery vividness ratings were observed between both experimental groups in terms of imagery type. The results are discussed in the context of previous studies, and new lines of research are proposed.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!