
In 1943, a cultivar of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) later known as Kentucky 312 was released for sale. This cool season grass became widely distributed in the southeastern United States because it was persistent in the face of drought, grew on poor soils and provided good erosion control, as well as large amounts of forage for hay or grazing.2 By 1950, it was recognized that animals grazing tall fescue did not perform as well as forage analysis would predict.2 In 1977, research (Bacon) revealed the presence of an endophyte, Neotyphodium coenophialum, in the intercellular spaces of the leaf sheath. Later research connected this endophyte with what is now recognized as fescue toxicosis.4,5 With the discovery of the endophyte in tall fescue, the solution to the toxicity problem became obvious: remove the endophyte.1 With endophyte-free fescue, animal performance improved but the plants were not as hardy, and stand loss in endophyte-free fescue became a problem.3
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
