
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.982765
This paper uses two different groups of firms, a group of innovative firms and a group of non innovative firms, in computer and software industry and compares them to estimate the stock market's valuation of innovation activities and examines how the stock price response to the innovation events. Two groups show different pattern of stock price during the high-tech boom period, while they have an identical pattern before and after the boom period. The observed different patterns are tested based on Tobin's q theory, and the results show that stock market valued significantly highly on innovation activity during 1996-1999. I employ simulation method to overcome the limitation of event study. This simulation method leads me to conclude that the usual event study method can misidentify the abnormal returns. I find the statistically significant cumulative abnormal returns before patent application events and patent grant announcement events. The information concentration, characteristics of innovation and previous cumulative abnormal returns affect the stock market's response to innovation events.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
