
In a trade model with endogenous emissions abatement, we investigate the impact of three policy instruments aimed at mitigating carbon leakage: free emission allowances, a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM), and a CBAM with export rebates. We show that providing free allowances does not alter the incentives to abate carbon emissions, but, instead fosters the entry of more carbon intensive producers. This “levels the playing field” both domestically and internationally, and may even reverse carbon leakage. In contrast, a CBAM only levels the playing field domestically, and may lead to an autarky equilibrium. To reverse carbon leakage, a CBAM must be complemented with export rebates. We further show that a CBAM and export rebates improve welfare for any carbon price, and we identify the optimal share of free allowances with or without a CBAM. Finally, we perform a calibration exercise on cement and steel sectors to simulate the effects of the CBAM recently adopted by the European Union. Our model predicts a scenario with reverse carbon leakage and significant welfare gains for both sectors.
330, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs • Distributional Effects • Employment Effects, JEL: H - Public Economics/H.H2 - Taxation, [SDE.ES] Environmental Sciences/Environment and Society, Trade, Export rebates, JEL: F - International Economics/F.F1 - Trade/F.F1.F18 - Trade and Environment, [SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environment and Society, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q58 - Government Policy, B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE, Subsidies, [QFIN]Quantitative Finance [q-fin], CBAM, Carbon leakage, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q54 - Climate • Natural Disasters and Their Management • Global Warming, Carbon pricing, Free allowances, JEL: F - International Economics/F.F1 - Trade/F.F1.F13 - Trade Policy • International Trade Organizations, and Revenue/H.H2.H23 - Externalities • Redistributive Effects • Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
330, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs • Distributional Effects • Employment Effects, JEL: H - Public Economics/H.H2 - Taxation, [SDE.ES] Environmental Sciences/Environment and Society, Trade, Export rebates, JEL: F - International Economics/F.F1 - Trade/F.F1.F18 - Trade and Environment, [SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environment and Society, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q58 - Government Policy, B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE, Subsidies, [QFIN]Quantitative Finance [q-fin], CBAM, Carbon leakage, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q54 - Climate • Natural Disasters and Their Management • Global Warming, Carbon pricing, Free allowances, JEL: F - International Economics/F.F1 - Trade/F.F1.F13 - Trade Policy • International Trade Organizations, and Revenue/H.H2.H23 - Externalities • Redistributive Effects • Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
