
handle: 10630/26345
This paper studies the economic consequences of orbital debris for commercial outer-space activities. Spacecraft launches and other outer-space human activities produce pollution (i.e., orbital debris), which represent a hazardous negative externality increasing the risk of collision and the destruction of satellites. We regard outer space as a global common resource, where firms operating satellites maximize profits and do not internalize the social cost of orbital pollution. We develop a dynamic investment model for satellites and simulate the calibrated model to estimate how debris affects the optimal quantity of satellites and launches, and the number of satellites destroyed by collisions. We find that the optimal quantity of satellites is a negative function of the amount of debris. The paper derives a simple expression for the maximum number of satellites to prevent the Kessler syndrome. For the baseline calibration of the model, the estimated threshold for the maximum number of satellites in orbit is about 72,000. The model is simulated to study the effects of a decline in the launch cost and the increasing number of satellites per launch.
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, Spain through grant PID2019-107161GB-C33. A. Bongers acknowledges financial support from Junta de Andalucía, Spain through grant PAIDI-2020-21-00853. Funding for open access charge: Universidad de Málaga/CBUA.
Launches, 330, Satellites, Outer space, Kessler syndrome, Satélites artificiales-Aspectos económicos, Risk of collision, Basura espacial-Aspectos económicos, Debris
Launches, 330, Satellites, Outer space, Kessler syndrome, Satélites artificiales-Aspectos económicos, Risk of collision, Basura espacial-Aspectos económicos, Debris
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 29 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
