Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Technical Feasibility Analysis of a Negative Emissions Beccs System for a Livestock Waste Treatment Plant

Authors: Pilar Lisbona; Sara Pascual; Virginia Pérez; Luis M Romeo;

Technical Feasibility Analysis of a Negative Emissions Beccs System for a Livestock Waste Treatment Plant

Abstract

The share of global greenhouse gas emissions from tertiary sector has increased during the last years and it has finally become a target sector to implement carbon capture and storage technologies. This study analyzes the potential application of a carbon capture system within a livestock waste treatment plant (LWTP). The main target is the technical assessment of the integration possibilities between the post-combustion carbon capture process and a real LWTP which deals with pig manure and corpse cattle. Currently, these wastes are processed to produce energy and their exploitation is regulated by Regulation (CE) no 1069/2009. The currently existing facility is able to cover energy demands (thermal and electric) through a cogeneration engine and a boiler to generate the steam required to sterilize the cattle corpses. The proposed BECCS system must fulfil the requirement of energy demands of the LWTP and be able to generate extra electricity. The carbon capture system is sized to enhance the use of the biogas produced in the LWTP and the design and operation parameters are established to ensure a high capture efficiency and the technical feasibility of the facility. Additionally, a Rankine cycle fed by waste heat from the capture process is sized and implemented to produce electricity and steam to livestock waste treatment process. Different heat integration possibilities are analyzed in the final configuration to increase the steam flow in the Rankine cycle, the self-coverage of thermal demand in the LWTP and the coverage of thermal requirement of the capture process. Lastly, the avoided CO2 emissions are calculated with respect to the current LWTP configuration.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!