
handle: 10419/215267 , 2318/1965532
The public sector hires disproportionately more educated workers. To rationalize this finding, we propose a model with a perfectly competitive private sector, and non-Walrasian public sector. Our economy also features heterogeneity across individuals and jobs, and a simple sorting mechanism that generates underemployment - educated workers performing unskilled jobs. We find that the public-sector wage differential and excess underemployment account for 15 percent of the education bias, with the remaining accounted for by technology. In a counterintuitive fashion, we find that more compressed wages in the public sector raise inequality in the private sector.
education, ddc:330, E62l, J45, polsoc, J24, public-sector wages, Economics as a science, underemployment, public-sector employment, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, E24, J20, J31, E62, HB71-74
education, ddc:330, E62l, J45, polsoc, J24, public-sector wages, Economics as a science, underemployment, public-sector employment, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, E24, J20, J31, E62, HB71-74
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
