
It is common to assume in empirical research that observables and unobservables are additively separable, especially when the former are endogenous. This is because it is widely recognized that identification and estimation challenges arise when interactions between the two are allowed for. Starting from a nonseparable IV model, where the instrumental variable is independent of unobservables, we develop a novel nonparametric test of separability of unobservables. The large-sample distribution of the test statistics is nonstandard and relies on a Donsker-type central limit theorem for the empirical distribution of nonparametric IV residuals, which may be of independent interest. Using a dataset drawn from the 2015 U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey, we find that the test rejects the separability in Engel curves for some commodities.
nonparametric IV residuals, FOS: Computer and information sciences, [STAT.ME] Statistics [stat]/Methodology [stat.ME], nonparametric IV regression, Econometrics (econ.EM), separability test, Engel curves, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, endogeneity, Statistics Theory (math.ST), Statistics - Applications, Methodology (stat.ME), FOS: Economics and business, unobservables, FOS: Mathematics, Applications (stat.AP), [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, Statistics - Methodology, Economics - Econometrics
nonparametric IV residuals, FOS: Computer and information sciences, [STAT.ME] Statistics [stat]/Methodology [stat.ME], nonparametric IV regression, Econometrics (econ.EM), separability test, Engel curves, Mathematics - Statistics Theory, endogeneity, Statistics Theory (math.ST), Statistics - Applications, Methodology (stat.ME), FOS: Economics and business, unobservables, FOS: Mathematics, Applications (stat.AP), [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, Statistics - Methodology, Economics - Econometrics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
