
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2881331
Blockchain technology allows for flexible settlement of trades. We build a model of intermediated trading with search frictions and counterparty risk. On the one hand, longer trade-to-settlement time increases counterparty risk exposure. On the other hand, liquidity improves since intermediaries have more time to adjust inventories. Optimal time-to-settlement decreases in counterparty risk and search intensity. However, with flexible time-to-settlement intermediaries specialize in either high- or low-default risk contracts. Consequently, price competition is relaxed. Intermediaries earn rents, increasing in their (common) default rate due to larger scope for specialization. A unique time-to-settlement for all trades in a given security improves welfare.
blockchain, trade settlement, Market design, vertical differentiation, G10, D47, G12, [SHS.GESTION] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, D43
blockchain, trade settlement, Market design, vertical differentiation, G10, D47, G12, [SHS.GESTION] Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration, D43
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
