
handle: 2108/216181 , 11697/149578
We address the problem of selecting the common factors that are relevant for forecasting macroeconomic variables. In economic forecasting using diffusion indexes the factors are ordered, according to their importance, in terms of relative variability, and are the same for each variable to predict, i.e. the process of selecting the factors is not supervised by the predictand. We propose a simple and operational supervised method, based on selecting the factors on the basis of their significance in the regression of the predictand on the predictors. Given a potentially large number of predictors, we consider linear transformations obtained by principal components analysis. The orthogonality of the components implies that the standard t-statistics for the inclusion of a particular component are independent, and thus applying a selection procedure that takes into account the multiplicity of the hypotheses tests is both correct and computationally feasible. We focus on three main multiple testing procedures: Holm’s sequential method, controlling the family wise error rate, the Benjamini-Hochberg method, controlling the false discovery rate, and a procedure for incorporating prior information on the ordering of the components, based on weighting the p-values according to the eigenvalues associated to the components. We compare the empirical performances of these methods with the classical diffusion index (DI) approach proposed by Stock and Watson, conducting a pseudo-real time forecasting exercise, assessing the predictions of 8 macroeconomic variables using factors extracted from an U.S. dataset consisting of 121 quarterly time series. The overall conclusion is that nature is tricky, but essentially benign: the information that is relevant for prediction is effectively condensed by the first few factors. However, variable selection, leading to exclude some of the low order principal components, can lead to a sizable improvement in forecasting in specific cases. Only in one instance, real personal income, we were able to detect a significant contribution from high order components.
Settore SECS-S/03 - STATISTICA ECONOMICA, Variable selection, Variable selection; Multiple testing; p-value weighting., E3 - Prices, C32 - Time-Series Models, Simulation Methods, 310, State Space Models, Dynamic Quantile Regressions, Diffusion Processes, Business Fluctuations, E32 - Business Fluctuations, Multiple testing; P-value weighting; Variable selection, Cluster Analysis, C38 - Classification Methods, Multiple testing, C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods, Variable selection, Multiple testing, p-value weighting, C22 - Time-Series Models, Dynamic Treatment Effect Models, P-value weighting, Principal Components, Cycles, Factor Models, Multiple testing; P-value weighting; Variable selection;, and Cycles, jel: jel:C22, jel: jel:E3, jel: jel:C53, jel: jel:E32, jel: jel:C32, jel: jel:C38
Settore SECS-S/03 - STATISTICA ECONOMICA, Variable selection, Variable selection; Multiple testing; p-value weighting., E3 - Prices, C32 - Time-Series Models, Simulation Methods, 310, State Space Models, Dynamic Quantile Regressions, Diffusion Processes, Business Fluctuations, E32 - Business Fluctuations, Multiple testing; P-value weighting; Variable selection, Cluster Analysis, C38 - Classification Methods, Multiple testing, C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods, Variable selection, Multiple testing, p-value weighting, C22 - Time-Series Models, Dynamic Treatment Effect Models, P-value weighting, Principal Components, Cycles, Factor Models, Multiple testing; P-value weighting; Variable selection;, and Cycles, jel: jel:C22, jel: jel:E3, jel: jel:C53, jel: jel:E32, jel: jel:C32, jel: jel:C38
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
