
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>In the past decade, innovations in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling have fueled a boom in the production of natural gas (as well as oil) from geological formations—primarily deep shales—in which hydrocarbon production was previously unprofitable. Impacts on US fossil fuel production and the US economy more broadly have been transformative, even in the first decade. The boom has been accompanied by concerns about negative externalities, including impacts to air, water, and quality of life in producing regions. We describe the economic benefits of the shale gas boom, including direct market impacts and positive externalities, providing back-of-the-envelope estimates of their magnitude. This article also summarizes the current science and economics literatures on negative externalities. We conclude that the likely scope of economic benefits is extraordinarily large and that continued research on the magnitude of negative externalities is necessary to inform risk-mitigating policies.
Environmental Impacts, Q42, Economic Benefits, ddc:330, Positive Externalities, Hydraulic Fracturing, Economic Benefits, Positive Externalities, Negative Externalities, Environmental Impacts, Negative Externalities, Q5, Q4, Hydraulic Fracturing, jel: jel:Q4, jel: jel:Q5, jel: jel:Q42
Environmental Impacts, Q42, Economic Benefits, ddc:330, Positive Externalities, Hydraulic Fracturing, Economic Benefits, Positive Externalities, Negative Externalities, Environmental Impacts, Negative Externalities, Q5, Q4, Hydraulic Fracturing, jel: jel:Q4, jel: jel:Q5, jel: jel:Q42
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 94 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
