
handle: 10419/101898
We derive a theoretical model of effort in the presence of career concern based on the multi-unit all-pay auction, and closely inspired by the Italian academic market. In this model, the number of applicants, the number of new posts, and the relative importance of the determinants of promotion determine academics' effort. Because of the specific characteristics of Italian universities, where incentives operate only through promotion, and where all appointment panels are drawn from strictly separated and relatively narrow scientific sectors, the model fits well Italian academia, and we test it in a newly constructed dataset which collects the journal publications of all Italian academics working in universities. We find that individual researchers respond to incentives in the manner predicted by the theoretical model: more capable researchers respond to increases in the importance of the measurable determinants of promotion and in the competitiveness of the scientific sector by exerting more effort; less able researchers do the opposite.
applied auction theory, academic job market; applied auction theory; career concerns; nepotism; publications, ddc:330, M51, I23, career concerns, nepotism, career concerns, applied auction theory, publications, academic job market, nepotism, I21, publications, academic job market, D44, jel: jel:D44, jel: jel:I21, jel: jel:M51, jel: jel:I23
applied auction theory, academic job market; applied auction theory; career concerns; nepotism; publications, ddc:330, M51, I23, career concerns, nepotism, career concerns, applied auction theory, publications, academic job market, nepotism, I21, publications, academic job market, D44, jel: jel:D44, jel: jel:I21, jel: jel:M51, jel: jel:I23
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
