In 2009 Cuadrilla, a gas drilling company requested a permit for a test drilling for shale gas in the community of Boxtel, the Netherlands. At that point Cuadrilla already received a concession of the national government for drilling at several places. The local town council negotiated the conditions under which this drilling would be acceptable to them – for example in a designated area for industrial development and with financial compensation – and indeed gave Cuadrilla the permission to start building a test drilling location. It was after this permitting process, that local and national policy controversy over this issue developed. In this paper, I theoretically and empirically explore the development of this societal and scientific controversy from an interpretative approach. I study frame shifts in the debate. In addition I focus on the boundary work – the interpretation and rhetorical demarcations of facts – that was part of the frame shifts. I demonstrate how the framing of the issue, and boundary work part of it, contributed to the emergence of this controversy, and how that resulted in a temporary national moratorium on fracking for shale gas.