
Abstract Procreation is the ultimate public goods problem. Each new child affects the welfare of many other people, and some (but not all) children produce uncompensated value that future people will enjoy. This essay addresses challenges that arise if we think of procreation and parenting as public goods. These include whether individual choices are likely to lead to a socially desirable outcome, and whether changes in laws, social norms, or access to genetic engineering and embryo selection might improve the aggregate outcome of our reproductive choices.
Eugenics, Parenting, Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Reproduction, Australia, Infant Welfare, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Reproductive Techniques, Genetic Enhancement, Assisted, Humans, Social Welfare
Eugenics, Parenting, Reproductive Rights, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Reproduction, Australia, Infant Welfare, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Reproductive Techniques, Genetic Enhancement, Assisted, Humans, Social Welfare
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
