
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1986419
The asymptotic efficiency of indirect estimation methods, such as the efficient method of moments and indirect inference, depends on the choice of the auxiliary model. Up to date, this choice is somehow ad hoc and based on an educated guess of the researcher. In this article we introduce three information criteria that help the user to optimize the choice among nested and non--nested auxiliary models. They are the indirect analogues of the widely used Akaike, Bayesian and Hannan-Quinn criteria. A thorough Monte Carlo study based on two simple and illustrative models shows the usefulness of the criteria.
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/330, efficient method of moments, Indirect inference, efficient method of moments, auxiliary model, information criteria, asymptotic efficiency, info:eu-repo/classification/jel/C13, C52, indirect inference, information criteria, auxiliary model, jel: jel:C52, jel: jel:C13
info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/330, efficient method of moments, Indirect inference, efficient method of moments, auxiliary model, information criteria, asymptotic efficiency, info:eu-repo/classification/jel/C13, C52, indirect inference, information criteria, auxiliary model, jel: jel:C52, jel: jel:C13
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
