
handle: 11245/1.351437 , 2434/173292 , 10419/95455 , 11565/3796496 , 11582/215622
We show how classic source-decomposition and subgroup-decomposition meth ods can be reconciled with regression methodology used in the recent liter ature. We also highlight some pitfalls that arise from uncritical use of the regression approach. The LIS database is used to compare the approaches using an analysis of the changing contributions to inequality in the United States and Finland.
Soziale Ungleichheit, inequality, decomposition, 330, ddc:330, Inequality ; decomposition, inequality, decomposition, ISI; decomposition; Inequality, Finnland, Inequality, Inequality, decomposition., Messung, D63, USA, jel: jel:D63
Soziale Ungleichheit, inequality, decomposition, 330, ddc:330, Inequality ; decomposition, inequality, decomposition, ISI; decomposition; Inequality, Finnland, Inequality, Inequality, decomposition., Messung, D63, USA, jel: jel:D63
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 75 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
