
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1032558
In this paper, we consider the open question on Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau of Nelsen [1991]. Using a technical hypothesis, we can answer in the positive. One question remains open: how can we understand the technical hypothesis? Because this hypothesis is not right in general, we could find some pathological cases which contradict Nelsen's conjecture.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
