Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ SSRN Electronic Jour...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ProdInra
External research report . 2007
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: ProdInra
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2007 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
https://dx.doi.org/10.60692/j5...
Other literature type . 2007
Data sources: Datacite
https://dx.doi.org/10.60692/9p...
Other literature type . 2007
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

Hedging Strategies in Forest Management

استراتيجيات التحوط في إدارة الغابات
Authors: Marielle Brunette; Stéphane Couture; Éric Langlais;

Hedging Strategies in Forest Management

Abstract

The paper focuses on forests management strategies for natural hazards of nonindustrial owners, in the case where the forest provides nontimber services. Nous introduisons un modèle de base à deux périodes où les propriétaires privés gèrent les risques naturels sur sa forêt grâce à l'accumulation d'économies sur son revenu individuel ou à l'adoption de pratiques sylvicoles. We show that : 1/ the harvesting rule, in the presence of amenity services and a random growth rate for forest, is smaller than the one predicted under the Faustmann' s rule ; 2/ savings and sylvicultural practices may be seen as perfectly substitutable tools for the management of natural hazards. À tout moment, notre analyse prédit que la règle de récolte présente une sensibilité spécifique aux effets de prix et/ou aux changements dans la distribution des risques naturels, en fonction de ce que les propriétaires forestiers optent pour la stratégie financière ou soustraient les pratiques sylvicoles.

The paper focuses on forests management strategies for natural hazards of non-industrial owners, in the case where the forest provides nontimber services. We introduce a basic two-period model where the private owner manages natural hazards on his forest thanks to the accumulation of savings on his individual income, or to the adoption of sylvicultural practices. We show that: 1/ the harvesting rule, in the presence of amenity services and a random growth rate for forest, is smaller than the one predicted under the Faustmann's rule; 2/ savings and sylvicultural practices may be seen as perfectly substitutable tools for the management of natural hazards. However, our analysis predicts that the harvesting rule displays a specific sensitivity to price effects and/or changes in the distribution of natural hazards, depending on whether forest owners opt for the financial strategy or undertake sylvicultural practices.

The paper focuses on forests management strategies for natural hazards of nonindustrial owners, in the case where the forest provides nontimber services. We introduce a basic two-period model where the private owner manages natural hazards on his forest thanks to the accumulation of savings on his individual income, or to the adoption of sylvicultural practices. We show that: 1/ the harvesting rule, in the presence of amenity services and a random growth rate for forest, is smaller than the one predicted under the Faustmann's rule; 2/ savings and sylvicultural practices may be seen as perfectly substitutable tools for the management of natural hazards. However, our analysis predicts that the harvesting rule displays a specific sensibility to price effects and/or changes in the distribution of natural hazards, depending on whether forest owners opt for the financial strategy or undertake sylvicultural practices.

The paper focuses on forests management strategies for natural hazards of nonindustrial owners, in the case where the forest provides nontimber services. We introduce a basic two-period model where the private owner manages natural hazards on his forest thanks to the accumulation of savings on his individual income, or to the adoption of sylvicultural practices. We show that: 1/ the harvesting rule, in the presence of amenity services and a random growth rate for forest, is smaller than the one predicted under the Faustmann's rule; 2/ savings and sylvicultural practices may be seen as perfectly substitutable tools for the management of natural hazards. However, our analysis predicts that the harvesting rule displays a specific sensibility to price effects and/or changes in the distribution of natural hazards, depending on whether forest owners opt for the financial strategy or undertake sylvicultural practices.

تركز الورقة على استراتيجيات إدارة الغابات للمخاطر الطبيعية للمالكين غير الصناعيين، في الحالة التي توفر فيها الغابة خدمات غير خشبية. نقدم نموذجًا أساسيًا من فترتين حيث يدير المالك الخاص المخاطر الطبيعية على غابته بفضل تراكم المدخرات على دخله الفردي، أو اعتماد ممارسات زراعة الحنجرة. نظهر أن: 1/قاعدة الحصاد، في وجود خدمات الراحة ومعدل نمو عشوائي للغابات، أصغر من تلك المتوقعة بموجب قاعدة فوستمان ؛ 2/يمكن النظر إلى الادخار والممارسات الزراعية على أنها أدوات بديلة تمامًا لإدارة المخاطر الطبيعية. ومع ذلك، يتنبأ تحليلنا بأن قاعدة الحصاد تظهر حساسية محددة لتأثيرات الأسعار و/أو التغيرات في توزيع المخاطر الطبيعية، اعتمادًا على ما إذا كان مالكو الغابات يختارون الاستراتيجية المالية أو يقومون بممارسات زراعية.

Country
Germany
Keywords

Economics, [SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio], Q0 - General, Q19 - Other, Risque, and Uncertainty/D.D8.D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Natural hazard, Natural resource economics, forêt, Natural (archaeology), Risk, Forest, Amenities, Savings and Sylvicultural practices, Business, Environmental resource management, Q10 - General, AMENITES;EPARGNE;PRATIQUES SYLVICOLES;RISK;FOREST;AMENITIES;SAVINGS;SYLVICULTURAL PRACTICES, Global and Planetary Change, Forest management, Geography, Life Sciences, Forestry, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q5 - Environmental Economics/Q.Q5.Q54 - Climate • Natural Disasters and Their Management • Global Warming, [SHS.ECO]Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, Environmental Policy, Amenities, Aménités, Knowledge, JEL: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics • Environmental and Ecological Economics/Q.Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation/Q.Q2.Q23 - Forestry, risque, Sustainability, Archaeology, Forêt, Physical Sciences, Amenity, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Savings and Sylvicultural practices, Risk, Risk; Forest; Amenities; Savings and Sylvicultural Practices, Environmental economics, Épargne et pratiques sylvicoles, Mathematical analysis, 333, Adaptive Management, Meteorology, FOS: Mathematics, Forest, pratique culturale, D20 - General, Distribution (mathematics), JEL: D - Microeconomics/D.D8 - Information, Q14 - Agricultural Finance, European Agricultural Policy and Reform, Climate Change Impacts on Forest Carbon Sequestration, Environmental Science, Finance, Mathematics, jel: jel:D81, jel: jel:Q23, jel: jel:Q0, jel: jel:Q54, jel: jel:Q10, jel: jel:Q14, jel: jel:Q19, jel: jel:D20

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
bronze