Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Soil Science Society...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Turnover of Nitrogen-15-Labeled Fertilizer in Old Grassland

Authors: D. S. Jenkinson; P. R. Poulton; A. E. Johnston; D. S. Powlson;

Turnover of Nitrogen-15-Labeled Fertilizer in Old Grassland

Abstract

In this paper we follow the fate of single applications of 15 N‐labeled fertilizer to old grassland, over a period of nearly 20 yr. In 1980 and 1981, 15 N‐labeled N was applied to two of the treatments on the Park Grass Continuous Hay Experiment at Rothamsted, started in 1856. The labeled N was applied at the same rate (nominally 96 kg ha −1 yr −1 ) and in the same chemical form (NH 4 or NO 3 ) as the unlabeled N normally applied as fertilizer to the selected treatments. After 19 yr, 69.6% of the N applied in 1980 as 15 NH 4 had been harvested in successive cuts of herbage, with a further 16.5% remaining in the soil. For 15 NO 3 , 64.3% had been harvested and 13.8% remained in the soil. The 15 N data were then used to calculate annual inputs of nonfertilizer N, annual losses of N and N turnover times in old grassland, assuming that the selected treatments were under steady‐state conditions. The annual input of N from nonfertilizer sources (rain, dry deposition, N fixation by leguminous components of the herbage, etc.) was large: 39 kg N ha −1 yr −1 for the NH 4 treatment and 31 kg for the NO 3 treatment. Leguminous plants made up <2% of the herbage in both the NH 4 and NO 3 treatments. The annual loss from the NH 4 treatment was 19 kg N ha −1 yr −1 and 24 from the NO 3 treatment. The gross turnover time of N in the root compartment (which included plant crowns) was 1.41 yr for the NH 4 treatment and 0.42 yr for NO 3 The gross turnover time of soil microbial N was 2.13 yr (NH 4 ) and 1.83 yr (NO 3 ): for humus N (i.e., soil N not in roots or microbial biomass) it was 181 yr (NH 4 ) and 116 yr (NO 3 ).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    46
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
46
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!