
In comparison to previous generations, families these days are leading increasingly complex lives. Children often have a diversity of experiences from various learning communities before they begin school. For example, they may have been involved in one or more early childhood settings before moving on to school, where they join the new community of the school; and they have the experience of the home community, which may or may not involve an extended family. They may be involved in cultural, sporting, artistic, and/or spiritual communities. A child may be involved in many communities each week, or may experience a number of different communities over a period of time. This can be referred to as the "multidimensionality of student experience" (Gonzalez, Moll, & Amanti, 2005, p. 6). Some of these communities may be very similar to each other--for example, involvement in a spiritual community may in many ways require knowledge of activities similar to those practised at home. Some communities may be very disparate; for example, a swimming lesson may operate very differently from a play group and have a different set of expectations and modes of participation. The constant factor, however, is the mediating one of the family. This article explores the knowledge families have of their child and the importance for teachers, families, and the child of sharing this knowledge. Funds of knowledge In their book Funds of Knowledge Norma Gonzales, Luis Moll, and Cathy Amanti define "funds of knowledge" as being "based on a simple premise: People are competent, they have knowledge, and their life experiences have given them that knowledge" (2005, p. ix). Gonzales et al. focus on teachers developing reciprocal relationships with families, in part to identify the knowledge, skills, and experiences of families that could be shared with the teachers to enhance classroom practice and students' learning: "[a] funds of knowledge approach facilitates a systematic and powerful way to represent communities in terms of resources, the wherewithal they possess, and how to harness these resources for classroom teachers" (p. x). As well as viewing a family's skills and knowledge as resources the teacher can tap into, it is also possible to see the family as a mediating factor in terms of the child's interactions with the various learning communities the child is involved in (as shown in Figure 1). This view highlights the necessity of developing reciprocal and responsive relationships between the family and the centre or classroom. In this framework the family can be seen as a pivotal point and constant frame of reference for the child. At any one time a child is a participant in many communities, not just one. It is the family, as the mediating factor, that has the knowledge of the child's experience of these things. Communities of practice When we look more closely at the child's experience of, and between, these communities, a useful concept is Etienne Wenger's (1998) definition of a community of practice as a "living context that can give newcomers access to competence and also invite a personal experience of engagement by which to incorporate that competence into an identity of participation" (p. 214). Children come to an early childhood centre or school with varying experiences of participation. Each of the communities they have been a part of may have functioned in entirely different ways, with a multitude of different foci. How they have approached these different settings and how their sense of belonging, engagement, and participation has developed are important indicators for a teacher in deciding how to scaffold and bridge a child's entry into, and learning within, any community of learning. Once again, it is often the family that holds this information. Reciprocal relationships In their exploration of funds of knowledge Gonzales et al. (2005) found that "once the relationship level of the communication between parents and teachers becomes more reciprocal . …
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
