
doi: 10.1520/jte20160054
handle: 1959.3/433777
Abstract It is known that the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) technique has not been standardized yet. A standardized SHPB technique is necessary to provide guidelines for determining the intrinsic material properties. One possibility to examine the consistency of the SHPB technique is to conduct a mini round-robin test. This paper examines whether consistent results can be achieved from three sets of SHPBs by conducting numerical simulations and physical tests on two metals: commercial copper and 6060-T5 aluminum. Both numerical simulation and physical tests employed three sets of SHPBs, namely, 12.7-mm-diameter SHPB made from the AISI 4140 steel, 13-mm-diameter SHPB made from the high-strength steel (HSS), and 14.5-mm-diameter SHPB made from maraging steel 350 (AISI 18Ni). The current study shows that consistent flow stresses (with an acceptable flow stress fluctuation of ±2.2 %) were obtained from these three sets of SHPBs, which indicates the possibility of SHPB standardization in the future.
621
621
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
