
doi: 10.1400/175887
handle: 10281/4243
It is generally agreed that poverty cannot be faithfully represented by a single monetary measure. Poverty involves many different aspects of life and people can be poor in different ways, to different degrees and from several points of view. For this reason, fuzzy multidimensional indicators have been proposed to measure material deprivation. However, the statistical procedures used to build such indicators do not seem to be fully consistent. In this paper we show how partially ordered set theory can help overcome such consistency problems, providing a sound basis for a multidimensional and fuzzy analysis of poverty. In particular, we propose new criteria to define fuzzy poverty membership functions and give a fuzzy generalization of the notion of quantile, that can prove useful in analyzing and comparing poverty data.
Multidimensional poverty measurement; Fuzzy approach; Partially ordered sets
Multidimensional poverty measurement; Fuzzy approach; Partially ordered sets
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
