
Since the derivation of human embryonic stem cells, and the subsequent generation of induced pluripotent stem cells, there has been much excitement about the ability to model and evaluate human organ development in vitro. The finding that these cells, when treated with BMP4, are able to generate the extraembryonic cell type, trophoblast, which is the predominant functional epithelium in the placenta, has not been widely accepted. This review evaluates this model, providing comparison to early known events during placentation in both human and mouse and addresses specific challenges. Keeping in mind the ultimate goal of understanding human placental development and pregnancy disorders, our aim here is two-fold: to distinguish gaps in our knowledge arising from mis- or over-interpretation of data, and to recognize the limitations of both mouse and human models, but to work within those limitations towards the ultimate goal.
placenta, 1.1 Normal biological development and functioning, Placenta, BMP4, Reproductive health and childbirth, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4, Regenerative Medicine, Medical and Health Sciences, Mice, Stem Cell Research - Nonembryonic - Human, Underpinning research, stem cells, Pregnancy, Animals, Humans, Embryonic Stem Cells, Pediatric, Contraception/Reproduction, Cell Differentiation, Biological Sciences, Stem Cell Research, trophoblast, Trophoblasts, Female, Developmental Biology
placenta, 1.1 Normal biological development and functioning, Placenta, BMP4, Reproductive health and childbirth, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4, Regenerative Medicine, Medical and Health Sciences, Mice, Stem Cell Research - Nonembryonic - Human, Underpinning research, stem cells, Pregnancy, Animals, Humans, Embryonic Stem Cells, Pediatric, Contraception/Reproduction, Cell Differentiation, Biological Sciences, Stem Cell Research, trophoblast, Trophoblasts, Female, Developmental Biology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
